1. Home
  2. News & Issues
  3. Women's Issues
photo of Linda Lowen

Linda's Women's Issues Blog

By Linda Lowen, About.com Guide to Women's Issues

As McCain Belittles "Health" of a Woman and Abortion, These Three Know Better

Friday October 17, 2008
With a hint of a smile on his face, John McCain's hooked-finger emphasis of a pregnant woman's "health" and the issue of abortion during the final presidential debate has drawn a lot of fire. The word most commonly used to describe his behavior? Mocking.

Jason Linkins at Huffington Post writes:

I had never seen the matter of a woman's health given AIR SCARE QUOTES. But that's precisely what John McCain did, sneeringly, as he attempted to portray support for a mother's health as an extreme position, when in fact, it is a mainstream position -- ground that even fervent pro-life individuals often concede.
In her commentary for the Women's Media Center, Peggy Simpson notes:
Here’s what McCain responded, his voice rising in moral indignation: “He’s [for] health for the mother. You know, that’s been stretched by the pro-abortion movement in America to mean almost anything. That’s the extreme pro-abortion position, quote ‘health.’”...McCain’s “health” exemption statement Wednesday showed his to be the extreme position: he differed with current law. The U.S. Supreme Court has struck down abortion bans that do not contain exemptions for the health and life of the mother.
Over at Crooks and Liars, here's Nicole Bell's take:
In trying to paint Obama as being for the great Republican bugaboo of late term abortions (because, you know, there are so many women running around and deciding after being pregnant for six or more months that being pregnant is no longer convenient for them), Obama replied that he didn't vote for the late term abortion ban because it had no provision for the health or life of the mother. And that's when McCain proved how heartless and clueless he is.
Bell links to a powerful Women' eNews article with personal stories of women whose lives were seriously endangered by their pregnancies and were saved by late term abortions:
[Tammy] Watts was in the eighth month of a much-wanted pregnancy and was eagerly anticipating the birth of her first child. During a routine ultrasound (the only way to detect abnormalities that require late-term abortion), she discovered her baby had Trisomy 13, a chromosomal abnormality that causes severe deformities and carries no hope of survival.

Because her baby was already dying and because this put her own life at stake, Watts had an intact dilation and extraction (D and X)...."Losing my baby at the end of my pregnancy was agonizing," says Watts. "But the way the right deals with this issue makes it even worse...."

Watts and other women affected by this issue have tried to make legislators listen....When Congress first considered the ban in 1995, Watts testified on Capitol Hill. So did Viki Wilson of Fresno, Calif., who had a late-term abortion because the brain of the fetus she was carrying had developed outside the skull. So did Vikki Stella of Naperville, Ill., whose fetus had dwarfism, no brain tissue and seven other major abnormalities.

All three women told legislators they owed their health to late-term abortions and that a continuation of their doomed pregnancies posed grave health risks such as stroke, paralysis, infertility or even death....Watts, Stella and Wilson point out that in virtually all cases, late-term abortions are the only way to respond to unanticipated complications: the death of the fetus inside the womb, problems that mean the fetus can't live outside the womb, or serious threats to the mother's health.

"No women has these procedures for frivolous reasons," says Stella. "They have them because it's their only choice."

During the final debate, instead of fixating so much on Joe the Plumber (who isn't even licensed or registered as a plumber in Ohio and owes back taxes), he should have focused on Tammy, Viki, and Vikki - the stories of three women who would have done anything not to end their life-threatening pregnancies in abortion, but who thankfully are alive to tell the tale.

Comments

October 18, 2008 at 9:30 am
(1) Trisomy mom says:

It is not their ONLY choice. I have a son with trisomy 13 who is 10 years old. There are many more children living with Trisomy 13 and we (the parents of these precious angels) are trying desperately to increase the awareness(especially to the physicians who often tell the mother there is no hope) that if given a chance, many do survive.

October 19, 2008 at 11:54 pm
(2) JW says:

I have a son who is 13 years old and is full Trisomy 13. It isn’t always fatal. Doctors have outdated medical information and unfortunately pass that on to the parents of trisomy families. Check out www.livingwithtrisomy13.org for beautiful pictures and stories of these precious children.

October 22, 2008 at 9:37 am
(3) Blissful says:

My heart aches for the 2 previous posters. I believe in karma, and I must bow to your strength and the depth of your love and devotion to your special children.

I do however, have to agree with the article. Not every woman could handle the situation the way you both do. It’s a personal decision, and not every woman (or her husband) would be able to live so stoicly.

I have been blessed by not experiencing the need to have an abortion in my lifetime, but I honor every woman enough to feel that it IS a personal decision and it should not be regulated by any force outside of the mother’s relationship with her Creator and God.

McCain’s lack of respect for this subject is only a small part of his disrespect for LIFE in general, which is obvious in his choice of a running mate who kills for fun and sport.
The man has no dignity and sincerely has the thoughtfulness and depth of a shallow mud puddle.

October 22, 2008 at 2:39 pm
(4) Kay says:

Abortion: should be a decision of ones self…NOT THE GOVERNMENT’S

Remember Law or not there WILL BE ABORTIONS… AS we are award abortions have existed SINCE THE BEGINNING OF TIME!!! A Law will not change abortion choices!

October 22, 2008 at 9:40 pm
(5) Alice says:

I have to think about the psychological health of women that have abortions. Each baby is its own separate person, right from conception. They are not a blob of cells or tissues! I believe that abortion is only necessary in extreme cases-to save the life of the mother (and there could still be feelings of guilt).

October 23, 2008 at 2:15 pm
(6) Blissful says:

Whether abortions are legal or not, they will happen as they always have.
I’m 58 and my mother’s generation did their own abortions at home. I had a very close friend who was almost blind because of her mom’s botched abortion. I knew another man who was totally blind for life due to a botched abortion.
If a woman wants an abortion, she’ll find a way to have one no matter what the law says….so the law may as well allow them so they can be done safely and correctly.

Leave a Comment

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>

Explore Women's Issues

About.com Special Features

What is a Recession?

Sure, we're all talking about it, but what, exactly, defines a recession? More >

Weird Breaking News

A daily look at some of the oddest (and dumbest) crimes around. More >

  1. Home
  2. News & Issues
  3. Women's Issues

©2009 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company.

All rights reserved.